Везде
PROSPECTS OF THE U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS'' FUNDING UP TO 2020
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PROSPECTS OF THE U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS'' FUNDING UP TO 2020
Annotation
PII
S268667300000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Krivolapov 
ORCID: 0000-0001-9658-2671
Edition
Issue 9 (573)
Pages
103-117
Abstract
The article delivers analysis of main issues connected with U.S. missile defense funding. Decisions on these issues will directly influence the ranking of priorities in missile defense funding and planning of regional missile defense architectures by the U.S. and its allies. The author analyses a course of the discussions in the U.S. and delivers conclusions about prospects of these discussions. During the final years of Barack Obama presidency there were several factors which would somehow affect missile defense policy of D. Trump administration. Greenert-Odierno Memorandum highlighted features of crisis in U.S. missile defense policy. Further development of Russian topic in missile defense debates in the U.S. coincides in time with amending National Missile Defense Act of 1999 towards expansion of legally fixed policy of U.S. missile defense building. Policy of saving in the interest of reducing federal budget deficit can affect U.S. missile defense planning. Cooperation between the U.S. and its allies also can influence the prioritizing in funding of certain U.S. missile defense programs.
Keywords
missile defense, space-based missile defense, National Missile Defense Act, East Coast missile defense site, European missile defense, Israeli missile defense
Date of publication
09.09.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
984
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials


 1. Desyat' let bez Dogovora po PRO / Pod red. S.M. Rogova i dr. Moskva: ISKRAN, 2012. 76 s 
 2. Krivolapov O.O. 2015. Finansirovanie PRO: diskussii vo vremya prezidentstva B. Obamy // SShA^Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. № 6. S. 104-116 
 3. Rogova N.V. 2016. Kongress i voennaya politika SShA // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke. №1. Available at: http://www.rusus.ru/?act=read&id=479 (accessed: 06.06.2016) 
 4. Carafano J., Bromund T. 2015. US Comprehensive Strategy Toward Russia, The Heritage Foundation, 9.12. Available at: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/12/us-comprehensive-strategy-toward-russia (accessed 02.01.2016)
 5. Heinrichs R. 2015. Staying Ahead of the Threat: Improvements Needed for U.S. Missile Defense, George C. Marshall Institute, 19.02. Available at: http://marshall.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Staying-Ahead-of-the-Threat-Heinrichs-Final-Final-02192015.pdf (accessed 22.02.2015)
 6. Karako T. 2016a. FY17 Budget Squeezes MDA's Research and Development, Center for Strategic & International Studies, 18.03. Available at: http://csis.org/publication/fy17-budget-squeezes-mdas-research-and-development (accessed 16.04.2016)
 7. Karako T. 2016b. Looking East: European Air and Missile Defense after Warsaw, Center for Strategic & International Studies, 14.07. Available at: https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/publication/160714_Karako_LookingEast_Web.pdf (accessed 24.09.2016)
 8. Karako T., Rumbaugh W., Williams I. 2016. The Missile Defense Agency and the Color of Money, Center for Strategic & International Studies, 21.07, available at https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/publication/160721_Karako_MDAColorOfMoney_HiRes-compressed.pdf (accessed 07.10.2016)
 9. Todorov K. 2016. Missile Defense Getting to the Elusive "Right Side of the Cost Curve", Center for Strategic & International Studies, 8.04. Available at http: // csis.org/files / publication/ 160408_Todorov_MissileDefense_Web.pdf (accessed 10.05.2016)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate