Additional sources and materials
1. Murav'yov A. O nauchnoj znachimosti rossijskikh zhurnalov po ehkonomike i smezhnym distsiplinam // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2013. № 4.
2. American Economic Association Universal Academic Questionnaire Summary Statistics. // Papers and Proceedings. 2008. Vol. 98. No. 2.; 2012. Vol. 102. No. 3.
3. Boschini A., and Sjögren A. Is Team Formation Gender Neutral? Evidence from Coauthorship Patterns? // Journal of Labor Economics. 2007. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 325-365.
4. Card D., and Della Vigna S. Nine Facts About Top Journals In Economics. NBER Working Paper 18665. Cambridge. January 2013.
5. Card D., and Della Vigna S. Revealed Preferences for Journals: Evidence from Page Limits. NBER Working Paper 18663. Cambridge. December 2012.
6. Ellison G. The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process // Journal of Political Economy. 2002. Vol. 110. No. 5. P. 947-993.
7. Gordon R., and Dah. G. Views Among Economists: Professional Consensus or Point-Counterpoint? NBER Working Paper 18728. Cambridge. January 2013.
8. Griffith R., Kocherlakota N., and Nevo A. Review of the Review: A Comparison of the Review of Economic Studies with its Peers. Unpublished Working Paper. September 2009.
9. Hamermesh D., Oster S. Tools or Toys? The Impact of High Technology on Scholarly Productivity // Economic Inquiry. 2002. Vol. 40. Issue 4. P. 539-555.
10. Hamermesh D. Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who And How? NBER Working Paper 18635. Cambridge. December 2012.
11. Johns B. The Burden of Knowledge and the ‘Death of the Renaissance Man': Is Innovation Getting Harder? // Review of Economic Studies. 2009. Vol. 76. No. 1. P. 283-317.
Comments
No posts found