Везде
USA AND NATO’S PARTNERSHIP POLICY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
USA AND NATO’S PARTNERSHIP POLICY
Annotation
PII
S268667300000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Prikhodko 
ORCID: 0000-0001-9764-4096
Edition
Issue 3 (519)
Pages
37-52
Abstract
The essay scrutinizes NATO’s partnership policy. Main trends in the current evolution of the USA and the Alliance attitudes towards security and defense cooperation with various sorts of partners are thoroughly analyzed. The author has attempted to determine to what extent NATO’s partnership steering is guided by a long-term strategy or rather it is moving by a reaction to unexpected international events.
Keywords
United States, NATO, Obama administration, security and defense partnership
Date of publication
01.03.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
888
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article
Services benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Active Engagement, Modern Defence. Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (http://www.nato.int/lisbon2010/strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf). 
 2. Active Engagement in Cooperative Security: A More Efficient and Flexible Partnership Policy (http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_04/20110415_110415-Partnership-Policy.pdf). 
 3. Chicago Summit Declaration. 20.05.2012 (http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_87593.htm). 
 4. Daalder Ivo H., Stavridis J. NATO's Victory in Libya: The Right Way to Run an Intervention // Foreign Affairs. March-April 2012. Vol. 91. No. 2. P. 2-7. 
 5. Edström H., Haaland Matlary J.H., and Petersson M. Utility for NATO - Utility of NATO? // NATO: The Power of Partnerships / Ed. by H. Edström, J.H. Matlary, and M.Petersson. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. P. 1-17. 
 6. Hillary Rodham Clinton. Foreign Policy Address at the Council on Foreign Affairs. 15.07.2009 (http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/july/126071.htm). 
 7. Moore R. Partnership Goes Global: The Role of Nonmember, Non-European States in the Evolution of NATO // NATO in Search of a Vision / Ed. by Gülnur Aybet and Rebecca R. Moore. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2010. P. 219-242. 
 8. Orfy M. NATO and the Middle East: The Geopolitical Context Post-9/11. London: Routledge (Taylor & Francis), 2010. P. XIII, 1-234. 
 9. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. February 2010. Washington, GPO. P. XVIII, 1-105. 
 10. Scowcroft B. The Atlantic Alliance Transformed (http://www.acus.org/new_atlanticist/atlantic-alliance-transformed). 
 11. Secretary Clinton’s Interview with Ekho Moskvy Radio. U.S. Department of State. 14.10.2009 (http://www.america.gov/st/texttrans-english/2009/October/20091014154038xjsnommis0.7830709.html). 
 12. Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Washington: U. S. Department of Defense. January 2012 (http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf). 
 13. Teti A. Europe and NATO's Response to the Arab Uprisings. 7.05.2012 (http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/andrea-teti/europe-and-natos-response-to-arab-uprisings).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate