References

Additional sources and materials

1. Korsakov G.B. Kosmicheskij aspekt amerikanskoj politiki natsional'noj bezopasnosti. – «SShA 
 Kanada», 2001, №7. 
 2. Report of the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization. Pursuant to Public Law 106–65, 11.01.2001.
 3. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), JP 3–14, Doctrine for Joint Space Operations,
 9.08.2002.
 4. U.S. Air Force. Counterspace Operations, Air Force Doctrine Document AFDD 2–2.1, 2.08.2004. 
 5. U.S. National Space Policy, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, The White House, 31.08.2006. 
 6. U.S. National Space Policy, Presidential Decision Directive/NSC-49/NSTC-8, Wash., 14.09.1996.
 7. Federation of American Scientists, Ensuring America’s Space Security: Report of
 the FAS Panel on Weapons in Space, Wash., October 2004. 
 8. P r e s t o n B., J o h n s o n D., E d w a r d s S., M i l l e r M., S h i p b a u g h C. Space Weapons,
 Earth Wars, MR-1209, RAND, Santa Monica, June 2002. 
 9. B e n n e t t J. USAF Details Cyber Command Organization, – «Defense News», 17.03.2008, p. 8.
 10. U.S. Air Force Headquarters USAF/XPXT, Transformation Division, The USAF Transformation
 Flight Plan FY 04–09, Wash., February 2004. 
 11. Unmanned Aircraft System Roadmap 2005–2030. DoD, Office of the Secretary of Defense,
 4.08.2005.
 12. S t e i n K. Air Force Plans Meeting on Space Attack Detection System, Space and Missile Defense Report, Wash., 14.06.2004. 
 13. Directed-Energy Weapons: Technologies, Applications and Implications. The Lexington Institute,
 February 2003. 
 14. G e r t z B. U.S. to Deploy Anti-Missile System by «04», – «The Washington Times», 17.12.2002;
 G r a h a m B. Missile Defense to Start in 2004, – «The Washington Post», 18.12.2002. 
 15. B o e s e W. Missile Defense Remains Budget Priority, – «Arms Control Today», March 2007,
 pp. 41–42.
 16. S i r a k M. U.S.A Works on Kinetic Energy Interceptor. – «Jane's Defense Weekly», 8.01.2003,
 p. 2; B o e s e W. U.S. Aims to Deploy Space-Based Missile Interceptors in Five Years, – «Arms Control
 Today», March 2003, p. 22.
 17. Idem. U.S. Details Boost-Phase Interceptor Plans. – «Jane's Defense Weekly», 10.09.2003, p. 12;
 S h e r m a n J. U.S. Navy Studies a Limited BMD. – «Defense News», 19.03.2004, p. 18. 
 18. S i n g e r J. AF Space Command to Study Arming ICBMs with Conventional
 Warheads. – «Defense News», 26.10.2004, p. 44; P i n c u s W. Commander Seeks Alternate Uses for
 ICBMs. – «The Washington Post», 21.04.2005; W o o l f A. Conventional Warheads for Long Range
 Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress, RL 33067, 6.09.2005;
 G o r d o n M. Pentagon Seeks Non-Nuclear Tip for Sub Missiles. – «The New York Times», 29.05.2006;
 A n d r e a s e n S. Off Target? The Bush Administration’s Plan to Arm Long-Range Ballistic Missiles
 with Conventional Warheads. – «Arms Control Today», July/August 2006, pp. 6–11.
 19. Report of the APS Study Group on Boost-Phase Intercept Systems for National Missile Defense,
 American Physical Society. Wash., July 2003. 
 20. B u t l e r A. MDA Adds Countermeasures to GMD Test. – «Aviation Week and Space Technology», 8.10.2007, p. 32. 
 21. S m i t h M. Military Space Programs: Issues Concerning DoD's Space-Based InfraRed System.
 Congressional Research Service, Wash., 24.06.2002; 2005 Space Almanac. – «Air Force Magazine», August 2005, pp. 44–64. 
 22. R i c h e l s o n J. America's Space Sentinels: DSP Satellites and National Security. Lawrence, 2001.
 23. Missile-Defense Satellites Due for Launch by 2007. – «Defense Week»,14.04.2003, p. 5. 
 24. C a c e r e s M. Military Satellites: The Next Generation. – «Aerospace America», January 2002,
 p. 20; P u t r i c h G., Sources: USAF’s Space Based Radar in Jeopardy. – «Defense News», 18.02.2008,
 p. 28. 
 25. N y i r i N. An Integrated Defense Strategy for Canada and the United States in NORAD. Lewiston (N.Y.), 2003.
 26. B a r n e t t J. Future War: An Assessment of an Aerospace Campaign in 2010. Maxwell AFB,
 Alabama, 1996; M a n t z M. The New Sword: A Theory of Space Combat Power. Maxwell AFB, Alabama, 1995. 
 27. G r a h a m T., H a n s e n R. Spy Satellites and Other Intelligence Technologies
 that Changed History, Wash., 2007. 
 28. P o s t o l T. Lessons of the Gulf War Experience with Patriot. – «International Security», Winter
 1991–1992, pp. 119–171; S t e i n R. Patriot Experience in the Gulf War. – «International Security»,
 Summer 1992, pp. 199–225. 
 29. T u t t l e R. New Tactics: Fast-Paced Technology in the Air and on the Ground Opens Doors in
 Iraqi Freedom. – «Aviation Week and Space Technology», 9.06.2003, pp. 50–51.
 30. M o o r e M. Twilight War: The Folly of U.S. Space Dominance. The Independent Institute. Oakland, 2007; H e y N. The Star Wars Enigma: Behind the Scenes of the Cold War Race for
 Missile Defense, N.Y., 2006; W r i g h t D., G r e g o L., G r o n l u n d L. The Physics of Space Security:
 A Reference Manual. Cambridge, 2005. 
 31. W i r b e l l L. Star Wars: U.S. Tools of Space Supremacy. N.Y., 2004; M o w -
 t h o r p e M. The Militarization and Weaponization of Space. Lexington, 2004; K r e p o n M., K a t z -
 H y m a n M. An Arms Race in Space Isn’t the Problem. – «Space News», 12.02.2007. 
 32. D e B l o i s B., G a r w i n R., K e m p S., M a r w e l l J., Space Weapons: Crossing the U.S.
 Rubicon. – «International Security», Fall 2004, pp. 50–84.
 33. J o h n s o n -F r e e s e J. Space as a Strategic Asset. N.Y., 2007. 
 34. D o l m a n E. Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age. N.Y. 2002.