Additional sources and materials
1. Political Science in History. Research Programs and Political Traditions. Ed. by J. Farr, J. Dryzek,
S. Leonard. Cambridge (Mass.), 2005, p. 10.
2. L i e b e r F. Political Ethics. Boston, 1838–1839; idem. Civil Liberty and Self-Government. Philadelphia, 1853.
3. B u r g e s s J. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Boston, 1890.
4. W i l l o u g h b y W. An Examination of the Nature of the State. N.Y., 1896.
5. W i l s o n W. The State. Elements of Historical and Practical Politics. Boston, 1889.
6. W o o l s e y Th. Political Science. N. Y., 1877.
7. G o o d n o w F. Politics and Administration. N.Y., 1900.
8. L o w e l l A. Essays on Government. Boston, 1892.
9. Z e i g l e r L., P e a k G. Interest Groups in American Society. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs
(N.J.), 1972, p. 6.
10. Ibid., p. 68.
11. M e r r i a m Ch. A History of American Political Theories. New York and London, 1968,
pp. 326–328. (Vpervye ehto sochinenie bylo opublikovano v 1903 g.)
12. G u n n e l l J. The Declination of the «State» and the Origins of American Pluralism. In: Political
Science in History, p. 21.
13. Ibid., p. 24.
14. L a b o r d e C. The Concept of State in British and French Political Though. – «Political Studies»,
2000, vol. 48, No. 3, p. 543.
15. S o l o m o n S. «Pluralism» in Political Science: The Odyssey of Concept. In: Pluralism in the Soviet Union. Essays in Honour of H. Gordon Skilling. Ed. by S. Solomon. London, 1983, p. 8.
16. G u n n e l l J. Op. cit., p. 34.
17. M a i t l a n d F. Introduction to: G i e r k e O. Political Theories of the Middle Age. Cambridge,
1900, p. XXV; F i g g i s J. Churches in the Modern State. 2nd ed. London, 1914, p. 49; C o l e G. SelfGovernment in Industry. 2nd ed. London, 1972, p. 11; L a s k i H. Authority in the Modern State. New
Heaven (Conn.), 1918, p. 27; idem. A Grammar of Politics. London, 1925, p. 37.
18. L a s k i H. Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty. New Heaven (Conn.), 1917; idem. Authority in
the Modern State. New Heaven (Conn.), 1918; idem. The Foundations of Sovereignty. N.Y, 1921. Vposledstvii ehti sborniki ne raz pereizdavalis', prichyom pervyj vykhodil i pod sokraschyonnym nazvaniem «The Problem of Sovereignty».
19. L a s k i H. Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty, p. VI.
20. Idem. Authority in the Modern State, p. VII.
21. Idem. The Foundations of Sovereignty, p. V.
22. M a g i d H. English Political Pluralism. N.Y., 1941, p. 49.
23. G u n n e l l J. Op. cit., p. 27.
24. F o l l e t t M. The New State. Group Organization – the Solution of Popular Government. N.Y.,
1923.
25. Ibid., rp. 10, 262.
26. Ibid., pp. 263–264.
27. Ibid., p. 267.
28. Ibid., pr. 311, 315.
29. E l l i s E. The Pluralist State. – «The American Political Science Review», 1920, vol. 14, No. 3,
p. 394.
30. Ibid., pp. 404–405, 406.
31. Ibid., r.407.
32. C o k e r F. The Technique of the Pluralist State. – «The American Political Science Review»,
1921, vol. 15, No. 2, p. 211.
33. Ibid., pp. 186–213.
34. C o k e r F. Recent Political Thought. New York – London, 1934, pp. 515, 517.
35. G u n n e l l J. Op. cit., p. 31.
36. S a b i n e G. Pluralism: A Point of View. – «The American Political Science Review», 1923,
vol. 17, No. 1, p. 34.
37. Ibid., pp. 49, 50.
38. E l l i o t t W. The Pragmatic Politics of Mr. H.J. Laski. – «The American Political Science Review», 1924, vol. 18, No. 2, p. 275.
39. Idem. Sovereign State or Sovereign Group? – «The American Political Science Review», 1925,
vol. 19, No. 3, p. 524.
40. Idem. The Pragmatic Revolt in Politics. N.Y., 1928, p. VIII.
41. Idem. Mussolini, Prophet of the Pragmatic Era in Politics. – «Political Science Quarterly», 1926,
vol. 41. No. 2, p. 164.
42. Idem. The Pragmatic Revolt in Politics, pp. 4–5.
43. M e r r i a m Ch. New Aspects of Politics. 3d ed. Chicago, 1970. (Vpervye ehta rabota, po suti
sbornik statej, ranee publikovavshikhsya v zhurnalakh, uvidela svet v 1925 g.)
44. R i s e S. Farmers and Workers in American Politics. N. Y., 1924.
45. O d e g a r d P. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. N.Y., 1928.
46. H e r r i n g E. Group Representation Before Congress. Baltimore, 1929.
47. K a r l B. Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago and London, 1974, p. VIII.
48. M e r r i a m Ch. Political Power. New York – London, 1964, p. 7. (Vpervye ehtot kurs lektsij
byl opublikovan v 1934 g.)
49. Idem. New Aspects of Politics, pp. 217, 216.
50. W h i t e L. Introduction to: W o o d d l y C. The Chicago Primary of 1926: A Study in Election
Methods. Chicago, 1926, p. 2.
51. M e r r i a m Ch. The American Party System. N. Y., 1922, p. 124.
52. G u n n e l l J. Op. cit., p. 23.
53. R i s e S. Op. cit., p. 7.
54. Ibid., p. 17.
55. Ibid., r. 217.
56. O d e g a r d P. Pressure Politics. The Story of Anti-Saloon League. N.Y., 1966, p. VII. (Reprintnoe izdanie, tekstual'no nichem ne otlichayuscheesya ot pervoj publikatsii, uvidevshej svet v
1928 g.)
57. O d e g a r d P. Op. cit., p. IX.
58. H e r r i n g E. Group Representation Before Congress. Baltimore, 1929.
59. Ibid., pp. 17–18.
60. D i c k i n s o n J. Social Order and Political Authority. – «The American Political Science Review», 1929, vol. 23, No. 2, pp 293–329; No. 3, pp. 593–632.
61. Ibid., No. 3, p. 619.
62. D i c k i n s o n J. Democratic Realities and Democratic Dogma. – «The American Political Science Review», 1930, vol. 24, No. 3, p. 287.
63. Ibid., p. 288.
64. Ibid., pp. 288–290.
65. Ibid., p. 291.
66. Ibid., p. 304.
67. Ibid., p. 395.
68. Ibid., p. 292.
69. G a r s o n D. Group Theories of Politics. Beverly Hills (Cal.), 1989, p. 37.
70. G u n n e l l J. Op. cit., p. 40.
71. B a r b o o k A., B o l t Ch. Power and Protest in American Life. N.Y., 1980, p. 5.
72. B o u r k e P. The Pluralist Reading of James Madison's Tenth Federalist. In: Perspective in
American History. Ed. bu D. Fleming and B. Bailyn. Cambridge (Mass.), 1975, vol. IX, p. 288.
73. G a r s o n D. Op. cit., p. 56.
Comments
No posts found